The introduction of Christianity effected no violent
revolutions of any kind in the social relations of men and
women, except by purifying these relations, and enforcing the
duties dependent upon them. Christianity did not dictate any
particular form of government, or any code of laws, but
enjoined obedience to the existing laws, when they were not
inconsistent with the laws of the gospel. The first
Christians, while they were themselves scarcely tolerated,
were not inclined to attempt a social revolution by opposing
the established system of monogamy; but they attempted to
oppose only its vices, and to remove them. They insisted,
from the first, upon purity and chastity in men and women
equally. They denounced prostitution, adultery, and frequent
and
Page 121
capricious divorces, and did what they could to eradicate
their practice. But before they attained any degree of civil
or religious freedom, or were in any situation to introduce
the purer system of polygamy, they had themselves become
thoroughly Romanized; and the errors of Gnosticism,
Platonism, and Montanism had then prevailed so extensively as
to impel them, at last, to attempt a social reformation in a
direction quite contrary to polygamy, by discouraging
marriage, and by introducing asceticism, monasticism, and
celibacy.
Page 122
GNOSTICISM IN THE FIRST CENTURY
Christianity was not fully tolerated in Europe till the time
of the Emperor Constantine the Great, in the former part of
the fourth century; and was not established by law as the
religion of Rome, till the reign of Theodosius, in the very
last part of that century; while Gnosticism and its cognate
errors began to be disseminated even in the first century, in
apostolic times: they prevailed extensively in the second
century, and had permanently corrupted the church in the
third and fourth. While the different Gnostic writers and
Page 123
teachers differed greatly from one another on many points of
belief, they were generally agreed in their fundamental
doctrines, which sprung from the ancient Persian or Magian
system of religion, and which taught the existence of two
eternal beings, - Ormuzd, or God, the author of good, and the
creator of light, which is his emblem; and Abriman, or the
Devil, the author of evil, and the creator of darkness, his
emblem. They believed that the world consisted of spirit and
of matter, both being eternal; the latter, essentially evil,
formed or moulded by the Devil from the eternal substance of
chaos, and the former, essentially good, proceeding out of
God, and still forming a part of God: hence, that the body is
vile, wicked, and dark; while the soul is pure, holy, and
light. The body, therefore, with its appetites and passions,
should be despised and subdued; while the soul, with its
superior attributes, should be cherished and obeyed. The
principal Gnostic teachers of the first century were Simon
Magus, Menander, and Cerinthus. They all studied at
Alexandria, and all became Christians. Cerinthus taught that
the man Jesus
Page 124
was born of Joseph and Mary in the natural way; that the
[spirit], Christ, descended on him at his baptism, in the
form of a dove; and, previous to the crucifixion, that the
[spirit] returned to God, leaving the man to suffer on the
cross.
GNOSTICISM AND PLATONISM OF THE SECOND CENTURY
In the second century, the Gnostic Christians became much
more numerous and influential. Among the writers and
teachers whom historians particularly mention were
Saturninus, Basilides, Carpocrates, Valentine, Bardesanes,
Tatian, Marcion, Montanus, Tertullian, and Origen. Saturninus
(A.D. 115) taught that Satan, the ruler of matter, was coeval
with the Deity; that the world was created by seven
angels, without the knowledge of the Deity, who, however, was
not displeased when he saw it, and breathed into man a
rational soul. Satan, enraged at the creation of the world
and the virtue of its inhabitants, formed another race of men
out of matter, with malignant souls like his own; and hence
arose the great moral difference to be observed among men.
The moral
Page 125
discipline of Saturninus was ascetic and severe: he
discouraged marriage, declaring it to be the doctrine of the
Devil;*1 he enjoined abstinence from wine and flesh, and
taught to keep under the body, as being formed from matter,
which is in its essence evil and corrupt. Bardesanes wrote
about A.D. 170, in the time of the the Emperor Marcus
Aurelius. "His moral system was ascetic in the extreme; he
enjoined his disciples to renounce wedlock, abstain from
animal food, and live in solitude on the slightest and most
meager diet, and even to use water instead of wine in the
Lord's Supper."*2 Montanus-(A.D. 175) insisted upon more
frequent and more rigorous fasts than had yet prevailed in
the church, for they had hitherto fasted only during the
passion-week; he forbade second marriages; taught the
absolute and irrevocable excommunication of adulterers,
murderers, and idolaters; required all chaste women to wear
veils; and forbade all kinds of costly attire and ornaments
of the person. His most distinguished disciple was
Tertullian, bishop of Carthage, a
Page 126
very learned and voluminous writer, whose works have been
held in the greatest estimation in every age. Origen, a
still more learned and more voluminous writer, and a very
eloquent preacher, embraced the Gnostic errors when a young
man, and carried his principles of subduing the passions of
the body to such an extent, that he made a eunuch of himself:
but in after-life, when he had spent many years in studying,
translating, and expounding the Holy Scriptures, and
understood them better, he regretted the rash act of his
youth, and greatly modified his Gnostic sentiments; so much
so, that many have accused him of teaching different views of
the same subject, and of contradicting himself. The first
Platonic philosopher who joined the Christians was Justin
Martyr, who was beheaded at Rome A.D. 155; followed by
Clement of Alexandria, A.D. 192, who had a school in the city
called the Catechetic School, which attempted to harmonize
the philosophy of Plato with the materialism of the Gnostics
by means of the common medium of Christianity. This scheme
was called the New Platonism; and a long contest prevailed
Page 127
between the followers of this system and the advocates for
gospel simplicity. But the victory appeared to be on the
side of the Platonists, which assured the lasting corruption
of Christianity; for learned Christians now began to maintain
that the Scriptures have a double meaning; one literal and
plain, and the other latent and symbolic: the literal or
esoteric sense to be taught to the people, and the latent or
esoteric sense to be communicated only to the initiated and
the faithful. A similar distinction in morals followed.
There was one rule for the multitude, and another for the
aspirants to higher sanctity. These were to seek retirement
and to mortify the flesh, avoiding marriage and all
indulgence of the senses. Hence originated the austerities of
religious hermits; hence the celibacy of priests, monks, and
nuns.
RELATION OF MONOGAMY TO CHRISTIANITY IN THE THIRD AND FOURTH
CENTURIES
At the council of Caesarea, A.D. 314, it was decided and
decreed, in the first canon, that, if a priest should marry
after his ordination, he must be deposed from office. The
seventh canon for-
Page 128
bids a priest to be present at the marriage of a bigamist.
At the council of Ancyra, in the same year, it was ordered,
in the tenth canon, that those deacons who expressed their
intention to marry at the time of their ordination might
innocently do so; but if they should marry without having
expressed such intention, they must be deposed from office.
At the first council of Carthage, A.D. 348, by the second
canon, it was ordered that all Christians who had violated
their vows of virginity by subsequent marriages should be
excommunicated; and, if they were priests, they should be
deposed from office.
Siricius, Bishop of Rome, in 385 ordered that every priest
and every deacon within his diocese who should marry a second
wife, or a widow, should be deposed from office.
While these Gnostic and Platonic sentiments were at work
corrupting the church within, the state of social life
without the pale of Christianity was much the same as it has
been described under the first six Caesars; or, if the
testimony of all the contemporary writers can be believed, it
was be-
Page 129
coming more and more corrupt. The Christians formed but a
small minority of the whole population, and they were
generally hated, and often persecuted. It is scarcely
possible for us to conceive of any greater depravity than
that of the age of Caligula and Nero; and we do not wonder to
learn that in the succeeding century the once mighty Roman
empire was beginning to totter to its fall. But before it
fell it was destined to be upheld a while by the fortitude of
Christians patriots; and, in turn, the purity of Christianity
was to become more and more sullied by its long contact with
Roman depravity, and its intimate complicity with Roman
monogamy.
CONSTANTINE AND THEODOSIUS
In the former part of the fourth century, the two joint
emperors were Constantine and Licinius. They agreed, at
first, to tolerate Christianity; but Licinius violated his
agreement, and commenced a persecution. Then Constantine,
who had himself been a pagan hitherto, resolved to favor the
Christians more than he had done already, and thus attach to
himself the most industrious and peaceable citizens, and the
most brave and loyal soldiers
Page 130
of the empire. In the year A.D. 324 the cross appeared for
the first time upon his banners; his rival was defeated, and
he became sole emperor. Then Constantine issued circular
letters, announcing his conversion to Christianity, and
inviting the people to follow his example. This call of the
powerful monarch was not unheeded. The Christian faith
spread rapidly: ministers of religion thronged the royal
court, and offices of honor and profit were conferred upon
Christians. Yet Constantine himself, through all his
subsequent life, was only a catechumen or inquirer, and was
not baptized, and received into full membership in the
church, until he was near his end. And, in the mean time, he
left the ancient system of the Roman state undisturbed; and
paganism, with its corrupt monogamy, was still the law of the
land. At length Theodosius, his grandson, required the
Senate, a majority of whom had hitherto remained pagans, to
choose between the two religions; and they were finally
induced to vote in accordance with his wishes, in favor of
Christianity. He soon (A.D. 392) published a severe edict
against paganism; and "Then pretended conversions became
numerous, the tem-
Page 131
ples were deserted, and the churches filled with
worshippers, and the religion under which Rome flourished for
twelve centuries ceased forever."*3
ASCETICISM AND MONASTICISM
And then at length, when Christianity became paramount in the
State, a permanent and decided social reform might have been
possible, had they tolerated polygamy, as the first
Christians had done in Judaea and other Asiatic countries;
for they would thus have made it possible for all to be
married that wished to marry, and thus have guarded
themselves from the terrible licentiousness of the pagans, by
the influences of which they were surrounded on every hand.
But, on the contrary, impelled by the prevailing influences
of Gnosticism, they not only retained their former monogamy,
but they made it more strict and ascetic than before, and
attempted an impossible reform by suppressing the amorous
propensities, and vainly endeavoring to eradicate them. The
bishops and doctors of the church had already done what they
could to discourage marriage, and bring it into disrepute,
es-
Page 132
pecially with the ministers of religion; but now they
for bade it to them altogether.
At the council of Toledo, in A.D. 400, it was ordered, by
canon seventeenth, that every Christian that had both a wife
and a concubine should be excommunicated; but he should not
be excommunicated who had only a concubine without a wife.
At the fourth council of Carthage, A.D. 401, it was ordered,
by canon seventieth, that all bishops, priests, and deacons,
who had wives, must repudiate them, and live in celibacy,
under penalty of deposition from office.
Pope Innocent I., about A.D. 412, in his official letter to
the two bishops of Abruzzo, orders them to depose those
priests who had been guilty of the crime of having children
since their ordination.
Thus the seeds of Gnostic error, that had been sown in the
church during the former periods of its history, now sprang
up anew, and bore a plentiful harvest. "Nothing," say
Keightley, "is more characteristic of the corruption which
Christianity had undergone then the high honor in which the
various classes of ascetics were held. These useless or
pernicious beings now actually swarmed
Page 133
throughout the Eastern empire, and were gradually spreading
themselves into the West. We have shown how asceticism has
been derived from the sultry regions of Asia, and how it
originates in the Gnostic principles. It had long been
insinuating itself into the church; but, after the
establishment of Christianity, it burst forth like a
torrent." "The hope of acquiring heaven by virginity and
mortification was not confined to the male sex: woman, with
the enthusiasm and the devotional tendency peculiar to her,
rushed eagerly towards the crown of glory. Nunneries became
numerous, and were thronged with inmates. Nature, however,
not unfrequently asserted her rights; and the complaints and
admonitions of the most celebrated fathers assure us that the
unnatural state of vowed celibacy was productive of the same
evils and scandals in ancient as in modern times."*4
MEDIEVAL SUPERSTITION AND IMMORALITY
"And then," says the learned ecclesiastical historian,
Mosheim, "the number of immoral and un-
Page 134
worthy Christians began so to increase, that the examples of
real piety and virtue became extremely rare. When the
terrors of persecution were totally dispelled; when the
church, secured from the efforts of its enemies, enjoyed the
sweets of prosperity and peace; when the major part of its
bishops exhibited to their flocks the contagious examples of
arrogance, luxury, effeminacy, animosity, and strife, with
other vices too numerous to mention; when multitudes were
drawn into the profession of Christianity, not by the power
of conviction and argument, but by the prospect of gain or by
the fear of punishment, - then it was indeed no wonder that
the church was contaminated with shoals of profligate
Christians, and that the virtuous few were, in a manner,
oppressed and overwhelmed by the superior numbers of the
wicked and licentious." "Nor did the evil end here; for those
vain fictions, which an attachment to the Platonic philosophy
and to popular opinions had engaged the greatest part of the
Christian doctors to adopt before the time of Constantine,
were now confirmed, enlarged, and embellished in various
ways. Hence arose the extravagant veneration
Page 135
for departed saints, the celibacy of priests, the worship of
images and relics, which, in process of time, almost totally
destroyed the Christian religion, or at least eclipsed its
lustre, and corrupted its essence." "A preposterous desire of
imitating the pagan rites, and of blending them with the
Christian worship, and that idle propensity which the
generality of mankind have towards a gaudy and ostentatious
religion, all combined to establish the reign of superstition
on the ruins of Christianity. Accordingly, frequent
pilgrimages were undertaken to Palestine and to the tombs of
the martyrs, as if there alone the sacred principles of
virtue and the certain hope of salvation were to be acquired.
The public processions and supplications, by which the pagan
endeavored to appease their gods, were now adopted into the
Christian worship, and celebrated with great pomp and
magnificence. The virtues that had formerly been ascribed to
the heathen temples, to their lustrations, to the statues of
their gods and heroes, were now attributed to the Christian
churches, to water consecrated by certain forms of prayer, to
the images of holy men; and the worship, of the martyrs was
modelled ac-
Page 136
cording to the religious services that were paid to the gods
before the coming of Christ."*5
Similar testimonies could easily be cited from Gibbon's
"Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire," from D'Aubigne's
"History of the Reformation," from the ancient works of
Eusebius, and the modern ones of Neander, and from hundreds
of others; but I will not weary my readers with them. Thus
it appears from the testimonies of all the historians,
ecclesiastical and civil, sacred and profane, that the
doctrines and practices which distinguish the Roman-Catholic
Church to-day were most of them derived from a very early
age, anterior to the civil acknowledgment and legal
establishment of Christianity. Keightley says, "The Church
of Rome is, in fact, very unjustly treated when she is
charged with being the author of the tenets and practices
which were transmitted to her from the fourth century. Her
guilt or error was not that of invention, but of
retention."
IMMUTABILITY OF THE ROMAN CHURCH
Her boasted claim of immutability is well sustained, as far
back, certainly, as the commence-
Page 137
ment of the fifth century. The Western empire survived till
the close of that century; and as the power of the emperors
continued to decline, that of the bishops of Rome, who were
afterwards called popes, continued to increase, till at
length they attained monarchical as well as hierarchical
power, and governed the religious and the social affairs of
the European world. And as the dogmas of the Roman Church
are now maintaining monogamy with many of its attendant
vices, and are now prohibiting marriage to its clergy, and
discouraging it in all its more earnest religious devotees,
of both sexes, so they always have done. And we have the
testimonies of all modern historians, all modern travellers,
and of modern statistics, that the vices of old Rome that
then attended its social system of monogamy are still the
vices of modern Rome, and of all the countries of Europe
giving the number of illegitimate children born there each
year, as greater then the number of those legitimate birth.
And it is not only on the corrupt soil of old Europe that the
licentiousness of ancient Roman monogamy
Page 138
still prevails, but also in the Catholic countries of new
America. In proof of this I will cite only one testimony,
where thousands might be cited, from a recent work entitled
"What I saw in South and North America." By H.W. Baxley,
M.D., Special Commissioner of the United-States Government.
D. Appleton & Co., New York, 1865. this is his description
of "what he was" in Lima, the capital of Peru: -
"It is rarely the case that one walks in any part of the
city, during the day or night, without being shocked by
sights of indecency, immodesty, and immorality, too gross
even to be hinted at, and disgraceful to the arrogant
civilization of the nation. If one thousand seven hundred and
ninety-three priests, exercising ecclesiastical authority and
performing religious functions in this city, as published in
its statistics, with seventy churches, forty-two chapels, six
hundred and twenty-eight altars, and vast power of influence
and enforcement, cannot produce a better state of morals and
manners, it shows either a defective system of religion, or
incapacity and faithlessness on the part of the executors of
the holy trust. The statements of candid citizens and of
foreign residents of many years compel the belief, that the
general demoroliza-
Page 139
tion is mainly due to a depraved clergy. If priests taking
vows of chastity and devotion alone to God, perjure
themselves, obey the lusts of the flesh, and scatter their
illegitimate offspring abroad, it is to be expected that they
will find imitators among those whose temporal purity they
should guard, and whose eternal welfare they should promote.
The unblushing boldness with which clerical debauchery stalks
abroad in Lima renders it needless to put in any saving
clause of declaration. The priest may be seen on the sabbath
day, as on others, in bull-ring and cock-pit, restaurant and
tavern, with commoner and concubine, joining in noisy revel,
or looking on with complacent sanction. Nor does the
going-down of the sun arrest his wayward peregrinations; for
he may be seen at that hour, at corners, with tapadas, in gay
and lascivious conversation, or threading by-ways in
fulfilment of a lustful assignation. If the bishop of
Arequipas will turn to the 'weak and beggarly elements of the
world,' if he cannot, like his great predecessor St. Paul,
'contain,' but must obey the carnal desires, 'let him marry,'
as he is commanded by the apostle, like an honorable man and
a consistent Christian; and let him not encourage the frailty
of depraved disciples by a shameless example of
licentiousness made public by his procurement of separate
apartments in Lima for his seven concubines and his
thirty-five illegitimate children.
Page 140
"The streets of this capital were yesterday the scene of a
procession which was a disgrace to its professed
enlightenment, and an idolatrous violation of its boasted
Christianity. A gorgeously-gilded throne, borne on the
shoulders of negroes, who were partially concealed by a deep
valance, supported the pontifically-attired effigy of St.
Peter; its right arm, moved by secret machinery, being
occasionally raised in attitude of blessing the throngs of
deluded worshippers who bowed their heads for its
benediction. Another similarly decorated dais bore a
life-size graven image of La Merced, the patron saint of
Peru; elegantly arrayed in curls, coronet, richly-embroidered
crinoline and robe, pearl necklace and earrings, brooch and
bodice; and holding in its uplifted jewelled fingers a silver
yoke. These effigies were escorted by prelates and other
ecclesiasties; and that of La Merced was preceded by six
pert-looking mulatto girls, - designed to represent virgins,
- carrying incense upon silver salvers, from which numerous
censers, swung by priestly hands, were kept supplied, and
rolled upward their clouds of perfume, to tell of the
adoration of her votaries. The whole procession moved to the
sound of measured chants sung by hundreds of the clergy, who
often bowed; behind whom followed the civic dignitaries of
the nation and
Page 141
city, bareheaded and reverential; and after these came the
plumed warriors, on horse and foot, with breastplate and
helmet, lance, sabre, musket, and cannon, flaunting banners,
and martial music, guarding the saints through the city, and
back to the altars of the Church of La Merced, whence they
came, and where they will receive hereafter, as heretofore,
the petitions and vows of thousands of misguided
religionists. Can popular regeneration be rationally looked
for when examples of ecclesiastical profligacy are patent to
the public eye, and when such violations of divine precepts
are practised, and such delusions devised to mislead the
ignorant?
"No one can scrutinize the social habits in Lima, without
becoming sensible of the fact that women are probably 'more
sinned against then sinning.' For they not only have
provocations to faithlessness, and opportunity afforded for
its indulgence by sanctioned customs, but they are taught by
the universally-recognized dissoluteness of the men not to
place any confidence in them, and not to contemplate marriage
as a means of happiness beyond its power to furnish an
establishment, and make a woman mistress of her own actions.
"In the street called San Francisco, opposite the monastery
of that name, a kind of barracks
Page 142
is found, containing quite a population apart from the rest.
There lives a class of women and children whom one would
think came in a direct line from the gypsies, if their
complexion did not show a variety of a thousand shades, from
white to black. These women are the acknowledged mistresses,
and the children the progeny, of the monks, who visit them at
all times, and pay them a regular stipend. "La casa de la
monjas,' - the house of the nuns, - as the people ironically
call it, is a real Gomorrah. The clerical protectors of the
tenants that inhabit it willingly mistake the chambers, not
having the weakness of the laity of being jealous of each
other. Do not suppose that we are amusing ourselves in
speaking ill of the monks of Lima. These abominations among
themselves, they are the first to expose; for in their stated
elections for superiors, such is the bitterness of rival
aspirants, that they publicly charge against each other these
infamous transactions, making known the number of their
concubines and illegitimate children."
Thus have Dr. Baxley and others cast the principal reproach
of this frightful immorality upon the poor priests; but does
it not belong rather to their entire social system? The
priests
Page 143
in assuming the vows of perpetual celibacy, and the people in
supporting the old Roman monogamy, which their Gnostic views
of Christianity require, have assumed more than human nature
is able to bear, and more than it ought to bear; and there
must be constant transgression and immorality as long as
their present system prevails.
And now I think I have fairly demonstrated that the European
social system of monogamy had its origin in Roman paganism,
and has been perpetuated by Roman Catholicism.
_____________________________________________________________
*1 Mosheim, Ecc. Hist., vol. 1, p. 246
*2 Keightley's Hist. Rom. Emp., part2, chap. 7.
*3 Keightley, Rom. Emp., part 3, chap. 6.
*4 Hist. Rom. Emp., chap. 6.
_____________________________________________________________
<--Previous Next-->